Stay Fit vs Plates: Which Offline Logger Is Better?

Plates is built around a specific idea: a workout logger doesn't need calorie tracking, a social feed, or a dashboard full of charts to be useful. It does sets, reps, weight, and progressive overload tracking, and stops there on purpose. That's not a limitation from cut corners — it's the actual design goal.

Price and scope

Both apps are free at every tier, with no ads and no account required. The real difference isn't price — it's scope. Plates' entire feature surface is logging and basic progression tracking. Stay Fit covers that same ground and extends into goals, streaks, and body tracking.

What Plates does that Stay Fit doesn't

Honestly, not much feature-wise. Plates' entire pitch is being smaller — fewer screens, a narrower feature set, and a UI that never asks you to consider a feature you didn't come for. If minimalism itself is the feature you want, Plates delivers that more purely than an app with more tabs on it, Stay Fit included.

Where Stay Fit adds more without adding cost

Stay Fit's logging flow is comparably fast to Plates' for the basic case — log a set, move to the next. The difference shows up once you want something beyond that single set: a streak that survives a planned rest day, body measurements across 9 types, progress photos, and goal tracking for weight or weekly frequency. Plates doesn't attempt any of that by design; Stay Fit includes all of it without adding a paywall anywhere in the process.

Choosing based on what you actually want

If you've tried fuller-featured trackers before and found yourself only ever using the logging screen, Plates matches that behavior directly — there's no unused surface area to navigate around. If you think you might eventually want to track a weight goal or take progress photos without switching apps later, Stay Fit covers both cases from day one at the same $0 price.